Jakub Kaczyński

Jakub Kaczyński

Industrial Portfolio Director

Transition Technologies PSC S.A.

Most factories don’t have a technology problem. They have a data problem dressed up as a technology problem – and a market full of vendors happy to sell them the wrong fix.

I’m Jakub Kaczyński, Industrial Portfolio Director in the Digital Manufacturing practice at TT PSC, a global industrial solutions integrator. With 15 years in the field and a technical background, I’ve spent enough time close to the machines, the historians and the integration layer to know where Industry 4.0 projects actually break – usually not where the slide deck promised.

What I’ve done

50+ delivered projects, most inside larger digital transformation programs where the stakes and the politics are real, spanning the US, Europe and Asia – primarily in Europe. I stay deliberately vendor-agnostic: I’ve deployed the major industrial platforms (ThingWorx, Kepware, Ignition and Litmus) across the stack, from OT connectivity and SCADA through MES and IIoT, and I pick the one that fits the plant, not the one with the best reseller margin. My sharpest work sits in the data layer itself: building a unified namespace so OT and IT finally speak the same language, then turning that clean, contextualized data into the analytics and decisions people actually act on.

One example: in a plant producing over a thousand tonnes of sweets a week, I led the team behind a recipe management solution built on a unified namespace – owning the high-level architecture and standardizing formulas so the same product runs the same way on every line. The approach is now being discussed as a template for the company’s other plants.

In the last few years my work has concentrated in food & beverage: high-mix lines, tight margins, OEE that has to move this quarter, not next roadmap.

How I work

End to end, in that order: define the business case first (if the numbers don’t add up, we stop), then choose the technology, then design the architecture, then support the rollout. I’d rather kill a project at the business-case stage than watch it die expensively six months after go-live. Pragmatic, realistic, and allergic to vendor hype.

Speaking

Turning shop-floor data into decisions is a recurring theme in my talks. Recent ones: „From Data to Decisions” at Smart Manufacturing Week 2026, „From Machine to Decision: Digital Transformation Step by Step” at IndustryX0 2025, and „How Smart Maintenance Drives Strategic Success” at Robotics Warsaw 2025.

Got a specific data or connectivity problem and want a straight answer? Reach out.

My latest articles

What is Unified Namespace? A practical guide

What is Unified Namespace? A practical guide

What is Unified Name Spac and why is it quickly becoming the “central nervous system” of modern manufacturing?

If your IT and OT worlds are still tied together with brittle point-to-point integrations, siloed data, and reports that are always a step behind, it’s time for a different approach. In this practical guide, we explain What is Unified Name Space, how it differs from the Purdue model, and how to design a scalable, real-time data layer using a consistent hierarchy, naming conventions, and governance. You’ll also learn the core implementation steps with MQTT/Sparkplug B or OPC UA—so every system can publish and subscribe to the same contextual, live source of truth.

Jakub Kaczyński
Jakub KaczyńskiIndustrial Portfolio Director
How Unified Namespace breaks down data silos in industrial data management

How Unified Namespace breaks down data silos in industrial data management

Industrial data is growing faster than most manufacturers can process — yet much of its potential remains locked inside disconnected systems, legacy integrations, and outdated architectures. As a result, critical insights arrive too late, operational decisions lose accuracy, and digital initiatives struggle to scale. This article explains why traditional data management can no longer support modern industrial needs and how a Unified Namespace approach helps eliminate silos, unify data flows, and create the real-time foundation required for Industry 4.0, advanced analytics, OEE optimization, and energy efficiency.

Jakub Kaczyński
Jakub KaczyńskiIndustrial Portfolio Director
OEE software comparison: off-the-shelf vs custom systems for manufacturers

OEE software comparison: off-the-shelf vs custom systems for manufacturers

Choosing the right OEE (Overall Equipment Efficiency) system is crucial for optimizing production performance. In this article, we highlight the key factors to consider when selecting an OEE system to effectively monitor machine efficiency, minimize downtime, and improve production quality. Learn how to choose a system that supports your factory’s growth and delivers real, measurable benefits.

Jakub Kaczyński
Jakub KaczyńskiIndustrial Portfolio Director
Machine Downtime Tracking: How Shift Data Improved KPIs on FMCG Production Lines

Machine Downtime Tracking: How Shift Data Improved KPIs on FMCG Production Lines

Machine downtime tracking improves KPIs only when downtime data carries context. A food and beverage manufacturer running semi-automated production lines already calculated availability, performance and quality from PLC data, yet its KPIs kept falling short. Once TT PSC correlated every downtime event with shift and operator data, the root cause became visible: unreported stoppages on […]

Jakub Kaczyński
Jakub KaczyńskiIndustrial Portfolio Director